AMC Pacer (an Auto so Homely it’s Cute?)


1975-AMC-Pacer-X
1975-AMC-Pacer-X

AMC Pacer

(an Auto so Homely it’s Cute?)

AMC Pacer
1976 AMC Pacer X
1976 AMC Pacer X

AMC Pacer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
AMC Pacer AMC Pacer coupe
Manufacturer American Motors (AMC)
Production 1975 – 1980
Assembly Flag of
the United States Kenosha, Wisconsin
Flag of Mexico Mexico City (VAM)
Class Compact
Body style(s) 2-door hatchback
2-door
station wagon
Layout front-engine,
rear wheel drive
Engine(s) 232 in3 (3.8 L) I6
258 in3 (4.2 L) I6
304 in3 (5 L) V8
Transmission(s) 3-speed manual
3-speed with overdrive
4-speed manual
3-speed automatic
Wheelbase 100.0 inches (2,540 mm)
Length 171.8 inches (4,364 mm) (coupe)
Width 77.3 inches (1,963 mm)
Height 52.8 inches (1,341 mm) (coupe)
Curb weight 3,000 pounds (1,361 kg)
Fuel capacity 21.9 US gal (83 L/18 imp gal)
Designer
Richard A. Teague

5-amc-pacer

The AMC Pacer is a two-door compact automobile produced in the United States by the American Motors Corporation between 1975 and 1980. Its initial design idea was started in 1971. The car’s unusual rounded shape with massive glass area greatly contrasted with the mostly boxy, slab-sided models of the era. The Pacer’s “jellybean” body style is a readily recognized icon of the 1970s.

amc-pacer-051108-450

Collectibility

Now old enough to be a “classic car”, the Pacer has come to be regarded in some quarters as a 1970s design icon. (According to Business Week magazine the 1970s were “infamous for disco, Watergate and some of the ugliest cars ever.

AMC_Pacer_01

Nevertheless, in spite of their bad reputations, cars of the 1970s era such as the Pacer are becoming collectors’ items. Business Week reported that the rising values of so-called “nerd cars” – ugly 1970s-era cars] – prompted the CEO of a major collector-car insurance company to buy a Pacer which has “inexplicably appreciated substantially beyond the $2,300 that he paid for it in 2004. In 2002 he said: “In what can sometimes be a sea of automotive sameness, the AMC Pacer continues to turn heads even today”, and he put the value of a “mint Pacer” at “between $4000 and $6000″, saying that “the increased value is fueled solely by the heart. This trend is all about a fascination with ’70s things almost because they were so bad.” 

1977 AMC Pacer Wagon
1977 AMC Pacer Wagon

The Pacer has been described as one of the formerly unloved cars from the 1970s that are enjoying a resurgence in both collectibility and auto restoration — especially among fans of cars from that era. The Pacer is one of several 1970s cars that were always thought of as cheap vehicles; therefore they were poorly maintained, which reduced their life expectancy. Also the heavy engines used in the car put more load on the front suspension than intended, which caused the rack & pinion steering to fail frequently on Pacers built in 1975.   

 

One longtime collector-car expert says you will pay just about the same — around $20,000 — for a complete restoration, whether it’s on a $1,000 1978 AMC Pacer or a $5,000 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. When restored, the value of the Pacer may be about $4,000, compared with the Camaro’s $25,000.

77 Pacer Wagon
77 Pacer Wagon

 Today the Pacer’s originality – as well as its deficiencies – are appreciated, if not loved, by car hobbyists and serious collectors alike.

1979 AMC Pacer station wagons
1979 Pacer wagon
1976 AMC Pacer
1976 AMC Pacer

1975 AMC Pacer mirthmobile

AMC Pacer History

amcpacer.com: The Pacer Page

1-amc-pacer

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
About these ads

About dummidumbwit

"I live in a trailer at the edge of town!" Neil Young=Revolution Blues
This entry was posted in Art, Business, Culture, Design, Economy, INTERNATIONAL, Media, Pop culture, Society, Technology and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to AMC Pacer (an Auto so Homely it’s Cute?)

  1. Harrel says:

    Yes, the engine was quite heavy. Perhaps too heavy for the engine mounts. With age, the engine settled and the oil pan eventually rubbed against the rack and pinion, and may have caused some leaks. However, I spoke with a gentleman who used to be the service manager at one of the largest AMC dealers in Texas, and he said the automated assembly process of the rack and pinion was to blame for the leaks. The machine assembly process would damage seals and many new R&P’s leaked on new vehicles. Even if a new replacement R&P was ordered, it too was machine assembled, and more than likely would leak. The only real fix was to replace the seals by hand. Also, the 150 pounds of glass made the Pacer tipsy, so the anti-sway bar was a good option to check when buying a Pacer. But the weight of the car also gave it a comfortable ride.
    The Pacer had many unappreciated design features that are used in modern cars today. It was the first car with hidden drip rails and was the first ‘cab-forward’ design. It was a round car in a boxy car world. Today, with the depletion of NOS parts and the lack of reproduction parts, along with the Pacer’s tendency to rust apart is making the little ‘fish bowl’ a nearly impossible car to restore. I love Pacers and own several. My daughter and I restored one for her first car and it wound up in Hot Rod Magazine. Please visit her web site at http://www.MoPacer.com. Thanks!

  2. wonker says:

    Interesting blog, I’ll try and spread the word.

  3. Is there any vaule to my 1979 pacer wagon with 40,000 original miles , great shap just pass emitions test

  4. Thanks for the good info…very good blog site.

  5. hepm001 says:

    Check out my blog!!!

  6. Nice oldschool cars are there any recent models of this?

  7. dummidumbwit says:

    No, but they had similar looking ones in the Jetsons??

  8. Peter Ciccarello says:

    loved the Pacer when it frist came out.. now i am trying to restore my 77 PACER .. NEED HELP…pciccare@b2xonline.com Rocker Mount VA.

  9. t bray says:

    i’m looking for motor mounts for a 76 pacer…i’ve already bought 2 sets ..neither of which are the correct ones, even if the dealer says they are….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s